Migration route
Microsoft Dynamics 365→SalesforceMigrate accounts, contacts, leads from Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce using a controlled process for extraction, mapping, transformation, validation, loading and reconciliation.
Dynamics 365 Sales to Salesforce is typically driven by a commercial CRM decision — sales tooling, AppExchange ecosystem or an acquisition standardising on Salesforce.
The source here is Dataverse rather than an ERP, so extraction is API-shaped and the constraint is throughput rather than data-model archaeology.
Scope is agreed in discovery. On this route it usually covers:
Domain in scope for a typical Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce programme.
Domain in scope for a typical Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce programme.
Domain in scope for a typical Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce programme.
Domain in scope for a typical Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce programme.
Domain in scope for a typical Microsoft Dynamics 365 to Salesforce programme.
One controlled pipeline, run as repeatable cycles.
What the source platform makes available, and the constraints that shape the extraction design.
A mapping workbook carries every field in scope from its Microsoft Dynamics 365 source through its transformation rule to the Salesforce target object and field. It is reviewed and approved with the business before the production migration, and applied identically in every cycle so a decision made once is not re-made under cutover pressure.
The differences between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Salesforce that create most of the work.
Dataverse GUIDs mean nothing in Salesforce. The cross-reference map is built as each object loads and consumed by everything referencing it.
Carrying the Dataverse GUID into a Salesforce External Id field makes reloads idempotent across cycles.
Where Dynamics used option sets and forms, Salesforce expresses the same conditionality through RecordType and picklist dependency — which changes what a valid value is.
Salesforce's two relationship types behave differently on deletion and ownership and must be chosen deliberately, not defaulted.
Tasks, appointments and emails resolve to parents that must already exist.
Load order is part of the design, not an implementation detail.
Mandatory fields, referential integrity, format checks, business-rule validation and duplicate detection run on the prepared data, so problems surface as reportable exceptions rather than as failed loads in Salesforce.
Source counts, transformed counts, rejected records and target counts, with control totals where the data supports them. Every discrepancy is categorised so the migration is approved on evidence rather than assertion.
The pipeline is run end to end more than once before anything touches production. A typical structure is a first rehearsal that surfaces the bulk of mapping and data-quality corrections, a second that applies them and demonstrates production readiness, and the production cutover itself. How many cycles a programme needs depends on data quality and scope, which is established during discovery.
Both Dataverse extraction and Salesforce Bulk API are governed; test volumes in the first cycle.
Standardise on the 18-character form throughout.
Owner drives visibility; unmapped owners must not default silently.
Extraction, mapping, transformation and load preparation for Salesforce.
Explore DataMove →Source-to-target reconciliation, migration lineage and audit evidence for every cycle.
Explore DataVault →Migration status, data quality and exception visibility across cycles.
Explore DataLens →We have not published a case study for this exact route. These delivered projects are the closest relevant experience.
Accounts, Contacts, Leads, Opportunities
View route →Oracle Fusion CX→SalesforceOrganizations, Persons, Leads, Opportunities
View route →SAP CRM→SalesforceBusiness Partners, Accounts, Contacts, Opportunities
View route →Microsoft Dynamics 365→Oracle FusionFinancials, Procurement, SCM, Master data
View route →Salesforce→Oracle Fusion CXAccounts, Contacts, Leads, Opportunities
Case study available →Tell us your source system, target platform, modules, data volumes and timeline. We can discuss the closest relevant migration experience and the recommended approach.