Oracle Fusion · Financials · Master data
Migrate customer master data into Oracle Fusion, covering the party, customer account, account sites, site uses, contacts, profile classes and tax attributes.
Oracle Fusion does not have a flat customer table. It has the Trading Community Architecture: a party that describes who the organisation is, one or more customer accounts describing your commercial relationship with it, account sites that place those accounts at addresses, and site uses that say what each site is for — bill-to, ship-to, dunning. A single legacy customer row typically becomes four or five TCA records.
That expansion is why customer migration reconciles differently from supplier migration. Counting customers in and customers out proves nothing on its own; the party, account, site and site-use counts each need their own expected figure.
Scope is agreed in discovery; this is the shape of the object.
| Data area | Typical information |
|---|---|
| Party | Organisation name, party number, party type, DUNS, party classification |
| Customer account | Account number, account name, status, account type, class |
| Party sites and account sites | Addresses and the accounts placed at them |
| Site uses | Bill-to, ship-to, dunning, statements — with primary flags |
| Contacts | Party contacts and their role at each account site |
| Profile classes | Credit limits, payment terms, dunning and statement settings |
| Tax | Tax registrations, tax classification, exemption certificates |
Dependency drives load sequence: a child cannot exist before its parent.
Confirm each of these before the first migration cycle.
Production-proven means we have delivered this object from that source. Supported and custom-mapping describe capability, not delivery history.
Object-level equivalence. Field-level mapping is produced per engagement.
| Source system | Source entity | Target object |
|---|---|---|
| Oracle EBS | Customer + Account + Site Uses | Fusion Party + Account + Site Uses |
| SAP ECC | Customer master (KNA1/KNB1/KNVV) | Fusion Party + Account + Sites |
| SAP S/4HANA | Business Partner (customer role) | Fusion Party + Account |
| Salesforce | Account | Fusion Party + Customer Account |
Customer Import FBDI (party, account, site, site use, contact files)
Trading Community REST services for incremental updates
Original System Reference to carry the legacy key onto the party
Every account resolves to a party; every site resolves to a party site.
A customer account that will carry receivables needs a bill-to site use.
Every mapped profile class is configured in Fusion.
Matched on tax registration, normalised name and address before load.
Validated per country against the configured tax regime.
What has to exist before this object can load.
What actually fails on this object, and why.
Counts alone rarely prove this object migrated correctly.
Party count, account count, site count and site-use count each against their own expected figure — not against a single customer number
Customers with open AR reconciled separately and at 100%
Bill-to and ship-to coverage: every account carrying receivables has a bill-to
Key field comparison on a sample: name, tax registration, credit limit, terms
Rejected records categorised, agreed exclusions listed
Extraction, mapping, transformation, validation preparation and target load generation.
Explore DataMove →Preserves source, prepared and target states for reconciliation, lineage and audit evidence.
Explore DataVault →Migration progress, data quality, exceptions and readiness across cycles.
Explore DataLens →Source-specific guidance for moving this object.
Published case studies whose scope included customers.
Tell us your source application, target system, object scope, volume and migration timeline. We can discuss the recommended migration approach and relevant Syntra ETL project experience.