MAJESCO / SAPIENS RECONCILIATION

    Majesco / Sapiens Migration Reconciliation — Framework for Statutory + GAAP Sign-Off

    Pre-built majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation framework for Oracle Fusion cutover and ongoing close. Premium, paid-loss, cash, ceded and reserve registers reconciled per close period with hash-signed evidence across P&C and L&A.

    5 registers
    Reconciled per close
    Schedule P
    Loss-development aligned
    3-way
    Parallel-run reconciliation
    30+ yr
    Reconciliation retained

    Why a structured majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation framework matters

    Insurance reconciliation isn't a row-count check. It's a per-LOB, per-state, per-period proof that written/earned/unearned premium, paid-loss, ceded recoveries and reserve history all tie out — and that the chain back to source survives 30+ years.

    Most ERP migration reconciliation projects produce a one-page summary: source rows = target rows, source total = target total, done. Insurance migration reconciliation can't operate that way. Premium ledger doesn't equal revenue — it splits into written, earned and unearned with different Fusion GL accounts and different recognition cadences. Paid-loss has to align with Schedule P loss-development triangle for NAIC statutory filing. Reserve history (case + IBNR) has to reconcile per claim per period for actuarial Asset Adequacy Analysis (AAA). Reinsurance ceded reconciliation has to tie bordereaux to source policies and claims across 30+ year horizons for long-tail liability.

    Without a structured framework, mid-market insurers end up with consultant-built Excel pivot tables that work for the first close and fall apart by the third. State-commissioner market-conduct exams arriving 2-5 years post-cutover then find no signed reconciliation chain and the response becomes a six-week reconstruction project at consulting rates.

    Syntra ETL's majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation framework delivers five hash-signed registers per close period — premium, paid-loss, cash, ceded and reserve evidence — automated, version-controlled and retained indefinitely in the long-term archive so future state-commissioner queries resolve in minutes, not weeks.

    Framework deliverables per close

    1
    Premium register
    Written, earned, unearned premium per LOB per legal entity per period — Majesco/Sapiens vs Fusion to the cent with hash signatures.
    2
    Paid-loss register
    Indemnity + expense + recovery per coverage per claim per period — Schedule P loss-development triangle aligned.
    3
    Cash register
    Daily cash receipts vs Fusion AR cash application per bank account — full daily tie-out for cutover and ongoing close.
    4
    Ceded register
    Ceded premium and ceded loss recovery per treaty per layer — bordereaux register vs Fusion ceded GL for 30+ year audit.

    The five reconciliation registers — what each one proves

    Each register is automated, hash-signed and retained for the longest applicable state-retention rule. Sign-off is by statutory accounting, GAAP accounting and actuarial.

    📊

    Premium register

    Written, earned, unearned premium per LOB per legal entity per period — source Policy module vs Fusion revenue + unearned liability — to the cent. Written/earned/unearned split honored per LOB.

    🛡️

    Paid-loss register

    Indemnity + expense + recovery payments per coverage per claim per period — source Claims module vs Fusion paid-loss GL — Schedule P loss-development triangle aligned for NAIC statutory.

    💳

    Cash register

    Daily cash receipts per bank account — source Billing module vs Fusion AR cash application — full daily tie-out for cutover window and ongoing close cycles.

    🔁

    Ceded register

    Ceded premium and ceded loss recovery per treaty per layer — source Reinsurance bordereaux vs Fusion ceded GL — preserved for 30+ year long-tail liability audit horizons.

    📈

    Reserve evidence

    Per-claim reserve change history (case + IBNR) preserved as evidence metadata on Fusion paid-loss records and in archive — actuarial loss-development triangle reconstructible for Schedule P and L&A AAA.

    📝

    Chain-of-custody log

    Per-record signed chain: source extract → transform → FBDI ZIP → ESS job → post-load hash. Retained for longest state-retention rule (typically 10-30+ years per LOB per state).

    The majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation workflow — full migration arc

    From initial bulk load through cutover to long-term archive retention. Structured, automated, signed.

    1

    Initial bulk load reconciliation — Pre-cutover

    Initial bulk extract of historical Majesco/Sapiens data reconciled to source: counts per entity per period, sum totals per LOB per legal entity, hash signatures per record. Variances investigated and resolved before parallel run.

    2

    3-way parallel-run reconciliation — 1-2 close cycles

    Source vs legacy integration target vs Syntra ETL target reconciled per close period. Variances between legacy and Syntra investigated and root-caused. Once clean for 1-2 close cycles, statutory + GAAP sign off.

    3

    Cutover-day reconciliation — Cutover day

    Final delta replay reconciled to source. Cutover-cut-off cleanly captured in chain-of-custody log. Legacy integration retired. Production cut to Syntra pipeline.

    4

    Post-cutover stabilization — First 30 days

    Daily reconciliation for first 30 days post-cutover with elevated review cadence — premium, paid-loss, cash, ceded and reserve evidence checked against source daily.

    5

    Ongoing close reconciliation — Monthly + quarterly

    Standard per-close reconciliation: five registers hash-signed and emitted within 1-2 hours of data freeze. Quarterly Schedule P loss-development triangle reconstruction for actuarial sign-off.

    6

    Long-term archive retention — Indefinite

    Per-close reconciliation packs retained in long-term archive partitioned by close period and LOB. State-commissioner market-conduct exam queries resolve in minutes from archive — no consultant reconstruction.

    Variance handling — auto-categorization and resolution

    When reconciliation flags a variance, the framework categorizes, drills down and routes to resolution. No more manual Excel investigation.

    🪙

    Rounding variance

    Sub-cent variances auto-accepted within configured tolerance threshold. Logged for transparency. No human investigation required.

    📅

    Date boundary variance

    End-of-period crossover variances (transaction-date vs accounting-date drift) auto-categorized; fixed in mapping; record re-staged and re-validated.

    ⚙️

    Custom rule drift

    Rate Manager or RuleXpress rule output drift (e.g., schedule-rating-credit changed mid-period) flagged with source rule version; decoding logic updated; re-validated.

    Late delta variance

    Source-system delta arrived post-extract; auto-detected by modified-since watermark; record replayed and re-reconciled.

    🔍

    Source quality issue

    Missing policy ID, NULL claim number, orphaned premium transaction in source — escalated to source-system data owners; resolution evidence logged in reconciliation pack.

    📋

    Resolution audit

    Every variance and resolution logged in the reconciliation pack with timestamp, owner and resolution evidence. Auditors verify resolution path independently.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation?+

    Majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation is the structured framework that proves every Majesco P&C/L&A Core Suite or Sapiens IDITSuite/CoreSuite/ALIS source record was correctly migrated into Oracle Fusion Financials — at row level, sum level and hash level — and that any variance is identified, root-caused and resolved before sign-off. It is wider than data validation (which is per-load) because it covers the full migration arc: initial bulk load reconciliation, parallel-run reconciliation across 1-2 close cycles, cutover-day reconciliation, post-cutover stabilization reconciliation and the multi-year historical archive reconciliation. Statutory accounting, GAAP accounting and actuarial all consume the reconciliation framework output.

    Why is majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation harder than typical ERP reconciliation?+

    Six reasons specific to insurance. (1) Premium ledger doesn't equal revenue — it equals written premium, of which only the earned portion is revenue, with unearned reserve as liability. Reconciliation has to honor the written/earned/unearned split per LOB per period. (2) Paid-loss has to align with Schedule P loss-development triangle for NAIC statutory filing. (3) Reserve history (case + IBNR) has to reconcile per claim per period for actuarial AAA substantiation. (4) Reinsurance ceded reconciliation has to tie bordereaux to source policies and claims across 30+ year horizons. (5) L&A deferred premium has its own recognition cadence and 1099-R reporting alignment. (6) State-of-admission spread means reconciliation runs per legal entity per state — not just per company.

    What does the Syntra ETL reconciliation framework deliver?+

    Five outputs per close period. (1) Premium register reconciliation: written, earned and unearned premium per LOB per legal entity per period — Majesco/Sapiens source vs Fusion target — to the cent with hash signatures. (2) Paid-loss register reconciliation: indemnity + expense + recovery payments per coverage per claim per period — Schedule P aligned. (3) Cash register reconciliation: daily cash receipts vs Fusion AR cash application per bank account. (4) Ceded register reconciliation: ceded premium and ceded loss recovery per treaty per layer — bordereaux register vs Fusion ceded GL. (5) Reserve history evidence: per-claim reserve change history preserved for Schedule P and L&A AAA. All five outputs are hash-signed for statutory and GAAP sign-off.

    How does majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation handle the parallel-run period?+

    During parallel run (typically 1-2 close cycles), the legacy Majesco/Sapiens → Fusion integration continues feeding Fusion alongside the new Syntra ETL pipeline. The reconciliation framework runs three-way: source (Majesco/Sapiens) → legacy integration target (Fusion records loaded by legacy path) → Syntra target (Fusion records loaded by Syntra path). Any variance between legacy and Syntra Fusion records is investigated and root-caused — typically the variance traces to a mapping difference, a custom-rule-output decoding difference or a transaction-date boundary handling difference. Once 1-2 close cycles run clean (zero variance between legacy and Syntra), statutory and GAAP accounting sign off and the legacy integration is retired.

    How is Schedule P loss-development triangle reconciliation handled?+

    Schedule P is the NAIC P&C statutory filing that requires loss-development triangles per LOB per accident year showing cumulative paid losses and case+IBNR reserves at each evaluation date. The reconciliation framework reconstructs the loss-development triangle from the migrated reserve history (preserved as evidence metadata on Fusion paid-loss records and in the archive) and compares against the same triangle reconstructed from the source Majesco/Sapiens Claims module. Any cell-level variance in the triangle is flagged with the specific reserve changes or paid-loss payments contributing to the gap. Actuarial signs off on the triangle alignment before the Schedule P filing is generated from Fusion data.

    How does the framework handle L&A reconciliation specifics?+

    L&A reconciliation adds five layers on top of P&C. (1) Deferred premium recognition: per-contract per-performance-obligation recognition reconciliation between ALIS source and Fusion Revenue Recognition target. (2) Cash value tracking: per-policy cash value at each policy anniversary reconciled between source and archive. (3) Dividend distribution: per-policyholder dividend payment reconciled between source ALIS, Fusion AP and 1099 reporting. (4) Surrender values: per-policy surrender value calculation reconciled at surrender event. (5) NAIC #797 replacement records: per-replaced-policy record completeness verified for state-commissioner exam response. The framework delivers an L&A reconciliation section separate from the P&C section so the respective accounting and actuarial sign-off owners can review independently.

    How are reconciliation variances investigated and resolved?+

    Three-tier investigation workflow. (1) Auto-categorization: variance flagged with category — rounding (sub-cent), transaction-date boundary (end-of-period crossover), custom-rule output drift (Rate Manager / RuleXpress rule output differs), source-system late delta (record arrived post-extract), source data quality issue. (2) Drill-down: specific records contributing to the variance pulled with source and target snapshots side-by-side. (3) Resolution: rounding variances accepted with tolerance threshold; date-boundary issues fixed in mapping; custom-rule drift fixed in decoding logic; late deltas replayed; source data quality issues escalated to source-system data owners. Every variance and resolution is logged in the reconciliation pack with evidence so auditors can verify the resolution path independently.

    How long is the reconciliation framework retained?+

    Indefinitely for the multi-year archive — and per the longest state-commissioner retention rule for the per-close reconciliation packs. New York indefinite for L&A. New York 6 years for P&C. Texas 10 years. Reinsurance ceded layers stretch retention 30+ years for long-tail liability. The reconciliation framework retains per-close packs hash-signed in the long-term archive partitioned by close period and LOB, so state-commissioner market-conduct exams arriving 5-15 years post-cutover can query the reconciliation pack for any historical close period in minutes — not weeks of consultant reconstruction.

    Ready to scope your majesco / sapiens migration reconciliation framework?

    Book a 30-minute discovery call. We'll walk through your Majesco/Sapiens module footprint, your statutory + GAAP + actuarial sign-off owners, your Schedule P and L&A AAA requirements, and your state-commissioner exam history — and propose a concrete reconciliation framework with five-register design.