Fixed-price infor ln migration assessment. Automated discovery across every Logistical and Financial Company, every Baan package, every customization and every Infor ION integration. Sized migration plan, risk register, executable business case — not a slide deck.
Consultant-led infor ln migration assessment work spends most of its budget on manual DD crawling, manual customization inventory and manual company-structure interviewing — work that the Syntra ETL extractor does automatically in days.
Infor LN tenants accumulate complexity in predictable places: Logistical Companies that were spun up for a divested business unit and never retired, Baan-script customizations written in 2008 that nobody remembers the purpose of, Infor ION integrations to systems that were decommissioned three years ago, and historical data volumes that quietly grew past the point where a default Fusion subscription tier can hold them. A traditional infor ln readiness assessment uncovers these through analyst interviews and manual DD crawling — burning 8–12 weeks and $200K–$500K before producing a slide-deck deliverable.
Syntra ETL inverts the model. The same extractor that powers the migration itself runs against the LN tenant in read-only mode and produces an automated discovery pack in days: every active Logistical and Financial Company, every package row count per company per fiscal year, every custom session and DD extension, every active BOD subscription. Analyst time goes to classification and judgment — not data collection.
The result is a four-part deliverable pack with executable evidence rather than analyst opinion: company-structure map, data-volume inventory, customization classification, and sized migration plan with risk register. Customers use the pack directly as their Fusion business case and as the scoping baseline for whichever delivery model they choose.
Each one is a place where consultant-led assessments traditionally slip. Each one Syntra ETL handles with automated discovery plus analyst judgment.
Every Logistical and Financial Company crawled, N:M relationships mapped, material companies identified — recommended Fusion target structure produced.
Row counts and storage footprint per package per company per fiscal year — drives Fusion subscription sizing and historical-data routing decisions (Fusion vs archive).
Every custom session, custom DLL, custom table and DD extension inventoried via DD crawl — classified by business value with Fusion-target recommendation.
Every BOD subscription, every ION Connect flow, every OS Portal integration mapped — Fusion-target recommendation per integration (REST API / OIC / retire).
Item-master export-control attributes, project-level ITAR flags, vendor country-of-origin classifications inventoried for aerospace/defense customers.
Current Infor LN sustaining, Oracle/SQL Server DB licence, OS Portal and ION Connect licence quantified — feeds the Fusion business-case TCO comparison.
A repeatable workflow that consistently delivers the four-part deliverable pack in 2–3 weeks.
LN DBA provisions read-only DB credentials for the Syntra extractor; ION admin provisions read-only BOD subscription. Credentials encrypted in customer-controlled cloud KMS. Discovery scope confirmed: which companies, which packages, which historical depth.
Syntra extractor crawls every active Logistical and Financial Company, every package table, every company-suffixed variant, every DD extension and every active BOD. Output: machine-readable inventory ready for analyst classification.
Baan-script analysts classify every custom session, custom DLL and custom report by business purpose: retire (no longer used), replace (duplicate native Fusion behavior), rebuild (genuine custom business logic to migrate as Fusion extension).
Every Infor ION integration mapped with Fusion-target recommendation: re-point to Fusion REST/SOAP API, route via OIC, retire if duplicate, or keep on ION as peripheral integration.
Migration leads size the project per module: timeline per phase, resourcing assumptions, risk register with severity and mitigation, budget envelope. Risks ranked by historical likelihood-of-slippage from prior LN engagements.
Four-part deliverable assembled, reviewed by Syntra ETL migration architect, presented to customer stakeholders (finance, manufacturing, projects, supply chain, IT). Sign-off and next-step decision.
The patterns we see repeatedly across infor ln migration assessment engagements — and that change the Fusion business case.
Most multi-company LN tenants carry Logistical or Financial Companies that were spun up for a divested unit, a closed plant or a finished project — retiring them shrinks the Fusion target structure.
Baan-script customizations from 5+ years ago routinely duplicate native Fusion behavior (form personalization → Page Composer, validation logic → Fusion validation rules) — retire rather than rebuild.
BOD subscriptions to systems that were decommissioned 3+ years ago still consuming ION cycles and confusing the integration map — retire before Fusion cutover.
10+ years of GL detail rarely needs to live in Fusion — routing to a long-term LN archive (read-only S3/Parquet with HGB-compliant evidence) cuts Fusion subscription cost dramatically.
German HGB 10-year retention, IFRS reporting, country-specific SAF-T — discovered as separate retention obligations per Financial Company rather than a single global rule.
Aerospace and defense customers consistently underestimate the volume of ITAR-controlled records (item-master, project, vendor) — surfaces during the assessment, not during the migration.
An infor ln migration assessment is a structured discovery exercise that catalogs everything in your Infor LN tenant that affects the cost, timeline and risk of moving to Oracle Fusion: the Logistical and Financial Company structure, the active package footprint (tc/tf/td/ti/tp/ts/qm/fm), the historical data volume per package and per company, the Baan-script customization inventory, the Infor ION integration map, the aerospace/defense classification surface (ITAR/DFARS), and the active sustaining and licence cost. The Syntra ETL infor ln migration assessment produces three deliverables in 2–3 weeks: a complete inventory pack with row counts and storage footprint per company per package, a sized migration plan with module-by-module timeline and resourcing, and a risk register ranking the items most likely to slip a consultant-led programme. Customers use the output as the basis for their Fusion business case.
A typical Syntra ETL infor ln migration assessment runs 2–3 weeks: week one for credential provisioning and automated discovery (the Syntra extractor crawls every Logistical and Financial Company, every active package and every DD extension), week two for customization classification (Baan-script sessions, custom DLLs, custom reports inventoried and tagged by business value), and week three for sizing, risk-scoring and business-case packaging. Compare this to traditional consultant-led readiness assessments that consume 8–12 weeks of analyst time and produce a slide deck rather than executable evidence. The assessment runs concurrently with normal LN operations — no downtime, no DD changes, no impact on month-end close.
The deliverable is a four-part pack. Part one: company-structure map showing every Logistical Company, every Financial Company, the N:M relationships between them, and the proposed Fusion target structure (Ledger per Financial Company, BU per material Logistical Company, Inventory Org per warehouse). Part two: data-volume inventory with row counts and storage footprint per package per company per fiscal year, plus growth projections. Part three: customization inventory listing every active Baan-script session, custom DLL, custom table, custom session, custom report and Infor ION integration, classified by business value (retire / rebuild in Fusion / replace with native Fusion capability). Part four: sized migration plan with phased timeline, resourcing assumptions, risk register and budget envelope — directly usable as the Fusion business case.
Multi-company LN configurations (where you have multiple Logistical Companies feeding multiple Financial Companies with N:M intercompany relationships) are the norm for European manufacturing, defense and aerospace customers — and they're where consultant-led assessments traditionally burn the most time. The Syntra ETL infor ln migration assessment crawls every active company combination in the tenant, identifies the operational-financial boundary, classifies each company as material/immaterial based on transaction volume and complexity, and produces a Fusion target structure recommendation. Customers commonly find 20–40% of LN companies are obsolete or duplicate and get retired during consolidation, simplifying the Fusion target before migration starts.
Yes — comprehensively. The assessment crawls the LN Data Dictionary (DD) to inventory every custom session, every Baan-script extension, every custom DLL, every custom table and every DD addition to standard tables. Each customization is classified by business purpose: form personalization (now Fusion Page Composer), workflow logic (now BPM/AMX), report extension (now OTBI/BI Publisher), data validation (now Fusion validation rules), or genuinely custom business logic (rebuild as Fusion extension). Approximately 30–50% of customizations in a typical LN tenant turn out to be obsolete or duplicate native Fusion behavior and get retired during migration — a finding that often surprises customers who assumed every customization was load-bearing.
Yes. Infor ION is the integration backbone for most LN deployments — connecting LN to CRM, EPM, MES, WMS, third-party logistics, banking and tax-authority systems via BODs (Business Object Documents). The Syntra ETL infor ln migration assessment inventories every active BOD subscription, every ION Connect flow, every OS Portal integration and every published API endpoint. Each integration gets a Fusion target recommendation: re-point to Fusion REST/SOAP APIs, route via Oracle Integration Cloud (OIC), retire if duplicate, or keep on ION as a peripheral integration. The integration map becomes part of the cutover plan so nothing breaks the day Fusion goes live.
The Syntra ETL infor ln migration assessment is delivered as a fixed-price engagement: typically $25K–$50K depending on company-count, package footprint and historical depth. The price includes credential-secured automated discovery via the Syntra extractor, customization classification by Baan-script analysts, sizing and risk-scoring by migration leads, and the four-part deliverable pack. No surprise scope changes, no per-day analyst billing, no inflated discovery phases. Customers consistently find the assessment pays for itself in eliminated consultant-led discovery cost (typically $200K–$500K for an 8–12 week analyst engagement) and in faster Fusion business-case approval cycles.
After the infor ln migration assessment deliverable is signed off, customers have three paths: proceed with Syntra ETL as the migration platform (typical for customers who validate the sized timeline and want to lock in the pre-built extractor and crosswalk advantage), proceed with a consultant-led programme using the Syntra assessment as the scoping baseline (typical for customers with existing SI relationships), or pause for Fusion business-case approval. Customers who proceed with Syntra ETL get the assessment cost credited toward the migration platform fee. Customers who pause keep the deliverable as a 12-month-valid evidence pack — re-running the assessment after material LN changes is a 1-week refresh, not a full re-do.
30-minute discovery call. We'll walk through your LN tenant scope, scope the assessment, agree fixed price and timeline — and have automated discovery running on your tenant within a week.