Production-grade infor ln data validation. Every record hashed at LN source, re-hashed post-Fusion-load. Multi-company reconciliation, intercompany elimination evidence, aerospace/defense chain-of-custody. Signed reconciliation packs for HGB, IFRS, SOX, SOC 2, DCMA.
LN's multi-company architecture, intercompany flows, project EVM and aerospace ITAR chain-of-custody mean a single missed record cascades. Aggregate-only reconciliation hides the cascade until audit.
Infor LN customers running multi-company configurations (which is most LN customers — European manufacturing, defense, aerospace) have intercompany flows that link a GL journal in one Financial Company back to its originating production order in a different Logistical Company, an item-master record that's shared across Logistical Companies with company-specific UOM conversions, and project allocations that span Financial Companies for shared-service costing. A single record missed during migration breaks the chain.
Traditional consultant-led infor ln data validation relies on spot-checks: pick a few journals, trace them through, declare victory. Fast but incomplete — and the gaps surface during the first HGB audit, the first ITAR review or the first month-end intercompany elimination. Syntra ETL's validation engine inverts the model: every record content-hashed at LN source per business key, every record re-hashed post-Fusion-load, deterministic comparison per company per period with zero variance threshold.
The result is a signed timestamped evidence pack per load — ready for controller sign-off, finance director sign-off, internal audit, external audit, HGB/IFRS/SOX/SOC 2 reviewers and (for aerospace/defense customers) DCMA and DSS audit. No reconstruction needed when auditors arrive. No 'we'll spot-check' answer that haunts cutover three months later.
Each layer runs automatically on every load. Each layer produces signed evidence ready for audit review.
Source LN record counts (per package, per company, per period) vs Fusion-loaded counts — zero variance threshold, failures surface before downstream loads run.
Debit, credit, quantity, amount per company per period reconciled to the cent — surfaces transformation drift before audit reviewers find it.
Content-hash per business key compared at source vs post-load — hash drift indicates row-level transformation bug, surfaced with field-level diff.
LN trial balance per Financial Company per period vs Fusion trial balance per Ledger per period, drillable to journal line and originating sub-ledger transaction.
LN production-order WIP per Logistical Company vs Fusion work-order WIP per BU — material issued, labor posted, overhead applied reconciled.
LN project commitments and actuals per project per period vs Fusion PPM commitments and actuals — EVM measures, budget burn, forecast-to-complete reconciled.
A repeatable per-load sequence that produces signed evidence in hours, not weeks.
Every LN record content-hashed at extract per business key. Hash signatures captured in signed manifest alongside record counts and sum totals — manifest cryptographically signed at extract.
FBDI/HDL payloads loaded to Fusion via ESS jobs, monitored, error rows captured locally with field-level diagnostic. Successful records re-hashed post-load.
Reconciliation engine compares source hashes vs post-load hashes, source counts vs loaded counts, source sums vs loaded sums per company per period — variance flagged with row-level drill-down.
LN trial balance vs Fusion trial balance per company per period reconciled to the cent. Production-WIP and project-WIP reconciled across systems. Drill-down to journal line and originating transaction available.
Six standard signed reconciliation reports assembled into a timestamped audit-ready evidence pack: counts, sums, hashes, trial balance, production WIP, project WIP. Plus custom reports per customer-defined reconciliation rule.
Evidence pack signed by controller, finance lead, manufacturing lead, projects lead, compliance lead. Retained in customer-controlled WORM storage with retention policy per jurisdiction (HGB 10-year, IFRS, SOX 7-year, ITAR 5-year).
The same signed reconciliation pack satisfies every reviewer — eliminating spreadsheet back-and-forth between teams.
Trial-balance reconciliation per Financial Company per period to the cent — controllers sign off on the same evidence the auditor will review.
Production-WIP reconciliation per Logistical Company — material issued, labor posted, overhead applied reconciled. Manufacturing signs the same pack as finance.
Project-WIP reconciliation per project per period — EVM measures, budget burn, commitments and actuals reconciled. PMO signs off on PPM data integrity.
Row-level hash evidence with full drill-down lineage — eliminates the 'we'll spot-check' answer that traditionally extends migration sign-off by weeks.
HGB 10-year retention evidence, IFRS reporting reconciliation, SAF-T export evidence — country-specific reviewers get the evidence they need without reconstruction.
ITAR/DFARS chain-of-custody preserved from source through every transformation — controlled-data audit reviewers get classification evidence ready.
Infor ln data validation is the post-load verification layer that proves every record extracted from LN landed correctly in Fusion — to the row, to the sum, and to the hash. Three levels of evidence: record-count reconciliation (every LN journal, every AP invoice, every production order present in Fusion), sum-total reconciliation (debit, credit, quantity, amount per company per period match LN exactly), and hash-signature reconciliation (each record content-hashed at LN source and re-hashed post-Fusion-load, hash drift indicates transformation bug or corruption). Syntra ETL's validation engine produces signed timestamped evidence packs per company per period — ready for controller sign-off, internal audit, external audit and HGB/IFRS/SOX/SOC 2 reviewers.
LN's multi-company N:M architecture, intercompany flows, project-WBS hierarchies and aerospace/defense ITAR chain-of-custody mean a single missed record can cascade into intercompany imbalance, project EVM drift, item-master inconsistency or ITAR audit findings. Traditional consultant-led infor ln data validation relies on spot-checks and aggregate reports — fast but incomplete. Syntra ETL's row-level validation engine hashes every record at extract and re-hashes post-load, producing deterministic evidence per company per period rather than statistical sampling. Aerospace/defense customers, German HGB filers and SOX-regulated multinationals consistently rate this as the single most important capability of the platform.
Multi-company LN configurations (where Logistical Companies feed Financial Companies with N:M relationships and intercompany flows between companies) need reconciliation at multiple levels: per Logistical Company (operational data — items, production orders, sales/purchase), per Financial Company (accounting — GL trial balance, AP aging, AR aging), and across companies (intercompany journals, intercompany inventory transfers, intercompany project allocations). Syntra ETL's validation engine reconciles at all three levels simultaneously, producing per-company evidence plus cross-company elimination evidence — so controllers and intercompany accounting teams sign off on the same load with the same numbers.
Every record extracted from LN is content-hashed at the source per business key (company + ledger + period + journal + line for GL, company + production-order + operation for manufacturing, etc.). Every record loaded into Fusion is re-hashed post-load using the same hash function. The reconciliation engine compares: counts (journals, lines, orders) per company per period, sum totals (debit, credit, quantity, amount) per company per period, and hash signatures per business unit per period. Any record failing Fusion validation is captured with the exact field-level reason ready for bulk fix. Output is a signed timestamped reconciliation pack: LN trial balance vs Fusion trial balance per company per period to the cent.
Yes — and it's the core technique for parallel-run sign-off. During the 1–2 month-end parallel-run window, both LN and Fusion process the same operational transactions. At month-end, the Syntra ETL validation engine runs reconciliation across both systems: LN trial balance per company per period vs Fusion trial balance per ledger per period, LN AP aging vs Fusion AP aging, LN production WIP vs Fusion work-order WIP. Any drift surfaces with row-level drill-down so the cause is identified before cutover sign-off. Customers consistently report the parallel-run validation pack as the single artifact that finance executives ask for before approving cutover.
Aerospace and defense customers running LN carry ITAR-controlled technical data, DFARS CUI and FAA 14 CFR Part 21/145 maintenance records — each requiring chain-of-custody preservation from source through every transformation to the destination. Syntra ETL's validation engine extends row-level reconciliation with chain-of-custody evidence: every controlled record tagged at extract with classification metadata, every transformation logged with the rule version applied, every Fusion-loaded record verified to preserve the classification flag, and every read-access logged for DCMA and DSS audit. Customers get the chain-of-custody evidence pack as a separate signed deliverable for controlled-data audit reviewers.
Six standard signed reconciliation reports per load: record-count report (LN counts vs Fusion counts per package per company per period, zero variance threshold), sum-total report (debit/credit/quantity/amount per company per period, signed to the cent), hash-signature report (content-hash drift per business key, zero drift threshold), trial-balance report (LN trial balance per Financial Company per period vs Fusion trial balance per Ledger per period, drillable to journal line), production-WIP report (LN production-order WIP per Logistical Company vs Fusion work-order WIP per BU), and project-WIP report (LN project commitments and actuals vs Fusion PPM commitments and actuals). Plus custom reports per customer-defined reconciliation rule.
Cutover sign-off requires evidence that Fusion is operationally identical to LN at the cutover instant — across finance, manufacturing, projects, supply chain and compliance. Syntra ETL's validation engine produces the cutover sign-off pack: a single signed document containing the trial-balance reconciliation per company per period, AP and AR aging reconciliation, production-WIP reconciliation, project-WIP reconciliation, intercompany elimination reconciliation, ITAR/DFARS chain-of-custody evidence, and parallel-run delta-replay evidence. Finance, manufacturing, projects, supply chain and compliance leads sign the same pack — eliminating the multi-week sign-off-by-spreadsheet back-and-forth that traditionally delays cutover.
30-minute call. Walk through your LN multi-company structure, intercompany footprint, project EVM and ITAR/DFARS exposure — leave with a concrete validation plan that satisfies every reviewer.