TYLER TECHNOLOGIES DATA VALIDATION

    Tyler Technologies Data Validation — Row, Count, Sum, Hash — Source vs Fusion

    Post-load Tyler Technologies data validation that reconciles every Munis, Eden, iNovah, Energov, Brazos and Courts Odyssey object against Oracle Fusion at row, count, sum and hash level. Fund accounting + GASB reconciliation, position-control + payroll, Courts case-financial-obligations, attached binaries — signed by CFO, Clerk, HR Director and external auditor before parallel-run.

    Row + hash
    Reconciliation depth
    7 sign-offs
    Before parallel-run
    40–60%
    Audit-hour reduction
    100%
    Fund-level GASB tie-out

    Why Tyler Technologies data validation is the last line of defence before parallel-run

    Loading data is not migrating data. Tyler Technologies data validation is the reconciliation workstream that proves — to the cent, to the row, to the hash — that every Munis, Eden, iNovah, Energov, Brazos and Odyssey object landed in Fusion exactly as it sat in the source.

    Counties and cities that skip Tyler Technologies data validation routinely surface fund-accounting variances during the first GASB-aligned audit, position-control discrepancies during the first parallel payroll, attached-binary gaps during the first public-records request and Courts case-financial-obligation drifts during the first Clerk-of-Court walkthrough. Every one of those surprises is preventable with structured Tyler Technologies data validation before parallel-run begins.

    The reconciliation engine compares source-side and target-side at four depths: row count (every Munis journal, every Eden receipt, every Energov permit, every Odyssey case is accounted for), sum (every fund-level trial balance, every payroll register total, every Courts AR balance ties to the cent), hash (every attached PDF, exhibit, court order, recorded image, W-4 / I-9 / direct-deposit form is hash-signed source-to-target), and business-rule (every fund-accounting rule, every GASB compliance rule, every CJIS partitioning rule, every union step/grade rule, every state-reporting integration field is preserved).

    Seven accountable parties sign the Tyler Technologies data validation pack before parallel-run begins: County CFO for fund accounting; budget office for encumbrance and PO carryover; external auditor for GASB compliance; HR Director for position control + payroll; union business agents for bargaining-unit-specific payroll; Clerk of Court for Courts case-financial-obligation reconciliation; CIO for integration tie-outs. Sign-off is fast because the evidence is row-level — no estimating, no slideware, no 'we'll figure it out in cutover'.

    What Tyler Technologies data validation covers

    1
    Fund accounting + GASB
    Trial balance by fund at cutover (General, Special Revenue, Capital Projects, Enterprise, Internal Service, Permanent, Fiduciary); fund-level + government-wide GASB 34 reconciliation; control-account tie-out.
    2
    Position control + payroll
    Active + frozen position count, FTE, encumbered budget; payroll register (gross, net, every deduction); W-2 / W-3, 1099, retirement-system contribution totals (PERS, NYSLRS, local pension).
    3
    Courts + Energov + iNovah
    Odyssey case-financial-obligations by case-type and court division; Energov permit-fee revenue and code enforcement fines; iNovah cashiering totals at daily-deposit-ticket level.
    4
    Attached binaries
    Every Munis HR W-4 / I-9 / direct-deposit, every Energov permit drawing / inspector signature, every Odyssey case filing / court order / sealed exhibit, every recorded deed / mortgage — hash-signed source-to-target.

    Six reconciliation workstreams in every Tyler Technologies data validation

    The reconciliations the County CFO, Clerk of Court, HR Director, union business agents and external auditor each walk through — with row-level evidence before sign-off.

    🏛️

    Trial balance by fund

    Munis vs Fusion trial balance by fund at cutover period-end. Opening + activity + closing + control-account tie-out. GASB 34 fund-level + government-wide reconciliation. External auditor signs.

    👥

    Position control + payroll

    Munis vs Fusion HCM position count, FTE, encumbered budget by union. Payroll register reconciliation (gross, net, every deduction). HR Director and union business agent walkthrough.

    ⚖️

    Courts case-financial-obligations

    Odyssey vs Fusion AR open-balance reconciliation by case-type and court division. Case-number cross-reference preserved. Sealed/juvenile in CJIS partition. Clerk of Court signs.

    🏗️

    Energov + iNovah revenue

    Permit-fee revenue, code enforcement fines, business license fees, utility payments, tax payments, parking citations reconciled at daily-deposit-ticket level. Parcel-ID + citizen-name cross-reference preserved.

    📎

    Attached binaries

    Every attached PDF, exhibit, court order, recorded image, W-4 / I-9 / direct-deposit form hash-signed source-to-target. Chain-of-custody log; CJIS-compliant access on sealed/juvenile binaries.

    🔌

    State-reporting integrations

    PERS, TCEQ, TWC, EDD, NYSLRS, state tax-warrant filings, federal SEFA — every state-reporting integration field reconciled source vs Fusion OIC submission.

    The Tyler Technologies data validation process — six stages

    A structured, automated Tyler Technologies data validation workflow that runs in parallel with the load and completes 1–3 weeks after the final load. Typical timeline: 3–5 weeks total.

    1

    Pre-load reconciliation harness — Pre-cutover

    Reconciliation engine configured for every in-scope Munis/Eden/iNovah/Energov/Odyssey/Brazos object. Row-count, sum and hash check definitions per object. Cent-level variance thresholds set. CJIS-compliant partition for sealed/juvenile reconciliation evidence.

    2

    Automated row + count + sum checks — Load Day +0

    On the same day every load batch completes, automated row-count, sum and hash checks run. Source-side trial balance pulled live. Cent-level variances flagged for investigation. Round-dollar variances trigger root-cause analysis.

    3

    Fund accounting + position control walkthrough — Load Day +1–7

    County CFO walks through trial balance by fund reconciliation. HR Director and union business agents walk through position-control + payroll register reconciliation. External auditor walks through GASB 34/68/87/96 compliance map.

    4

    Courts + Energov + iNovah walkthrough — Load Day +3–10

    Clerk of Court walks through Odyssey case-financial-obligation reconciliation. Community Development Director walks through Energov permit-fee reconciliation. Treasurer walks through iNovah cashiering reconciliation.

    5

    Attached binaries + integrations — Load Day +7–14

    Hash-signed attached-binary inventory reconciled source-to-target. CJIS-compliant access tested on sealed/juvenile partitions. State-reporting OIC integrations tested with synthetic submissions. Citizen Self-Service portal DNS redirects tested.

    6

    Sign-off + parallel-run start — Load Day +14–21

    Seven accountable parties sign the Tyler Technologies data validation pack: CFO, budget office, external auditor, HR Director, union business agents, Clerk of Court, CIO. Parallel-run begins. Tyler tenant moves to read-only. Cutover-snapshot becomes immutable.

    What the Tyler Technologies data validation evidence pack contains

    A row-level, signed, audit-grade evidence pack — usable for the first GASB-aligned audit, the first parallel payroll walkthrough, the first Clerk-of-Court case-financial walkthrough, and every subsequent compliance review.

    📊

    Trial balance reconciliation

    Munis vs Fusion trial balance by fund at cutover period-end. Opening + activity + closing + control-account tie-out. GASB 34 fund-level + government-wide. External auditor walkthrough complete.

    👥

    Position + payroll reconciliation

    Active + frozen position count, FTE, encumbered budget by union. Payroll register (gross, net, every deduction). W-2 / W-3, 1099, retirement-system contribution totals. HR Director + union sign-off.

    ⚖️

    Courts case-financial reconciliation

    Odyssey vs Fusion AR open-balance by case-type and court division. Case-number cross-reference. Sealed/juvenile in CJIS partition. Clerk of Court walkthrough complete.

    📎

    Hash-signed binaries inventory

    Every attached PDF, exhibit, court order, recorded image, W-4 / I-9 / direct-deposit form hash-signed source-to-target. Chain-of-custody log. CJIS-compliant access controls.

    🔌

    State-reporting reconciliation

    PERS, TCEQ, TWC, EDD, NYSLRS, state tax-warrant filings, federal SEFA — every state-reporting integration field reconciled. OIC submission tested with synthetic payloads.

    Sign-off pack

    Seven accountable-party signatures (CFO, budget office, external auditor, HR Director, union business agents, Clerk of Court, CIO) gating the move to parallel-run. Audit-grade evidence retained indefinitely.

    Frequently asked questions

    What does Tyler Technologies data validation cover after the load to Oracle Fusion?+

    Tyler Technologies data validation is the post-load reconciliation workstream that proves — at row, count, sum and hash level — that every Munis, Eden, iNovah, Energov, Brazos and Courts Odyssey object landed in Oracle Fusion exactly as it sat in the source. The reconciliation runs across fund accounting (trial balance by fund + control account), position control (active position count, FTE, encumbered budget), Courts case-financial-obligations (open AR by case-type), Energov permit-fee revenue, iNovah cashiering totals, payroll register (gross, net, every deduction code, every benefit deduction, every garnishment), W-2 / W-3 totals, 1099 vendor totals, fixed asset register (acquisition cost, accumulated depreciation, net book value), open encumbrances and PO commitments, and grant project-cost tie-out. Tyler Technologies data validation completes before parallel-run begins and is signed by County CFO, Clerk of Court, HR Director and external auditor.

    How does Tyler Technologies data validation reconcile fund accounting and GASB compliance?+

    Fund accounting reconciliation is the highest-stakes workstream in any Tyler Technologies data validation. The reconciliation engine compares the Munis trial balance by fund at period-end (General Fund 100, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Projects Funds, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, Permanent Funds, Fiduciary/Pension Funds) against the Fusion Public Sector Financials trial balance by fund at the same period-end. Every fund-level reconciliation includes: opening balance, period activity, closing balance, inter-fund transfer-in and transfer-out, control-account tie-out, GASB 34 fund-level + government-wide reconciliation, and the period-end close evidence pack. Variances at the cent level are flagged for investigation; variances at the round-dollar level trigger root-cause analysis and remediation before sign-off. The external auditor walks through the Tyler Technologies data validation pack as the first audit-walkthrough of the new Fusion environment.

    How does Tyler Technologies data validation handle position control and payroll?+

    Position control + payroll reconciliation is the second highest-stakes workstream in any Tyler Technologies data validation — and the most likely surface for union grievances if it lands incorrectly. The reconciliation engine compares the Munis Position Control snapshot at cutover (every active and frozen position, FTE, encumbered budget, step/grade, union code, civil service class) against the Fusion HCM Position Management snapshot at the same cutover. Every union-by-union reconciliation pack is produced for the HR Director and union business agent walkthrough. Payroll register reconciliation compares the last Munis payroll run (gross, net, every deduction code, every benefit deduction, every garnishment) against the first parallel Fusion payroll run — to the cent. W-2 / W-3 year-to-date totals are reconciled at calendar-year boundaries. 1099 vendor totals are reconciled at calendar-year boundaries. Retirement-system contribution totals (PERS, NYSLRS, local pension boards) are reconciled against state-reporting submissions.

    Does Tyler Technologies data validation cover Courts Odyssey case-financial-obligations?+

    Yes — Courts case-financial-obligation reconciliation is a dedicated workstream in any Tyler Technologies data validation where Courts Odyssey is in scope. The reconciliation engine compares the Odyssey open-AR snapshot at cutover (every active case with outstanding fines, fees, restitution, court costs, child-support orders) against the Fusion AR snapshot at the same cutover, grouped by case-type (felony, misdemeanor, civil, family, probate, juvenile, traffic, ordinance) and by court division. Case-number cross-reference is preserved end-to-end so collection workflows continue uninterrupted. Sealed and juvenile case-financial-obligations are reconciled in the CJIS-compliant partition with expungement-aware access. Clerk of Court signs the Tyler Technologies data validation pack as the first court-administration walkthrough of the new Fusion AR + Odyssey-integration environment.

    How does Tyler Technologies data validation handle Energov permits and Citizen Self-Service?+

    Energov + Citizen Self-Service reconciliation covers the revenue-side surfaces of any Tyler footprint where Community Development is in scope. The Tyler Technologies data validation reconciles Energov permit-fee revenue, code enforcement fines, business license fees and contractor registrations against the Fusion AR landing, with parcel-ID and citizen-name cross-reference preserved end-to-end. iNovah cashiering totals (utility payments, tax payments, parking citations, permit fees, court fines) are reconciled at the daily-deposit-ticket level. Citizen Self-Service portal payment-history reconciliation compares pre-cutover Tyler portal payment history against the post-cutover archive + new portal access. DNS-level redirects from old Tyler URLs to the new portal are tested with synthetic citizen lookups before parallel-run begins.

    How does Tyler Technologies data validation handle attached PDFs, exhibits and document images?+

    Attached binaries reconciliation is the most under-appreciated workstream in any Tyler Technologies data validation — and the single largest source of post-cutover surprises if it is skipped. The reconciliation engine compares the source-side attachment inventory (every Munis HR W-4 / I-9 / direct-deposit form, every Energov permit site plan / inspector signature, every Odyssey case filing / court order / sealed exhibit, every recorded deed / mortgage / lien image, every iNovah signed deposit ticket) against the target-side archive partition with hash-signed evidence per file. Volume is significant: counties commonly carry 5–40 TB of attached binaries across their Tyler footprint. The Tyler Technologies data validation pack documents the full inventory, the hash-signed evidence per file, the chain-of-custody log, and the CJIS-compliant access controls on sealed/juvenile binaries.

    What evidence does the Tyler Technologies data validation pack contain for the external auditor?+

    The Tyler Technologies data validation evidence pack handed to the external auditor (typically a regional CPA firm conducting the GASB-aligned annual audit) contains: the trial balance reconciliation by fund at cutover period-end (source vs target, opening + activity + closing + control-account tie-out); the inter-fund transfer reconciliation; the GASB 34 fund-level + government-wide reconciliation; the position-control reconciliation by union and bargaining unit; the payroll register reconciliation (gross, net, every deduction code); the W-2 / W-3 and 1099 year-to-date reconciliations; the open-encumbrance and PO-commitment reconciliation; the grant project-cost tie-out for every federal grant under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.334; the fixed asset register reconciliation; the Courts case-financial-obligation reconciliation; and the attached binaries inventory with hash-signed evidence. Auditors uniformly report a 40–60% reduction in audit fieldwork hours when the Tyler Technologies data validation pack replaces ad-hoc tenant queries.

    How long does Tyler Technologies data validation take and who signs it off?+

    Tyler Technologies data validation runs in parallel with the load workstream and completes 1–3 weeks after the final load — typical timeline 3–5 weeks total. The reconciliation engine runs automated row-count, sum and hash checks on every loaded object on the same day the load completes; cent-level variances are flagged for investigation on the same day; round-dollar variances trigger root-cause analysis and remediation cycles. The Tyler Technologies data validation pack is signed by seven accountable parties before parallel-run begins: County CFO for fund accounting; budget office for encumbrance and PO carryover; external auditor for GASB compliance; HR Director for position control + payroll; union business agents for bargaining-unit-specific payroll; Clerk of Court for Courts case-financial-obligation reconciliation; CIO for integration tie-outs. Parallel-run does not begin until every signature is in.

    Ready to scope your Tyler Technologies data validation?

    Book a 30-minute discovery call. We'll walk through your Tyler product footprint (Munis, Eden, iNovah, Energov, Brazos, Odyssey), your fund-accounting reconciliation requirements, your union/position-control situation, your Courts case-financial-obligation volume and your attached-binary inventory — and scope a Tyler Technologies data validation programme that lands signed-off inside 3–5 weeks.