JD EDWARDS DATA VALIDATION

    JD Edwards Data Validation — F0902-Anchored, Audit-Ready

    Post-load jd edwards data validation against F0902 GL trial balance, F0411 AP aging, F03B11 AR aging, F4111 item ledger and F1202 fixed-asset balance — to the cent, every Company × Account × Period, with a signed audit pack per load wave.

    F0902 anchor
    GL reconciliation source
    Cent-level
    Trial balance parity
    SHA-256
    Hashed audit trail
    Signed pack
    Per load wave

    Why jd edwards data validation has to be F0902-anchored and per-period — not 'looks right'

    A trial balance that ties to the cent is the difference between a controller signing the parallel-run pack and a cutover that slips a month while the variance hunt drags on.

    JDE Financials carries its truth in two tables: F0911 Account Ledger (every journal line ever posted) and F0902 Account Balances (the period-end summary by Company × Object × Subsidiary × Period). Every JDE close cycle runs against F0902. Every JDE financial report agrees to F0902. Every external auditor reconciles to F0902. So every jd edwards data validation against Fusion has to start with F0902 — and reconcile to the cent at Company × Account × Period — or the controller cannot sign the parallel-run pack.

    The complication is the crosswalk: JDE's Company × Business Unit × Object × Subsidiary structure (with 30 category codes layered on F0006) becomes Fusion's 6-segment COA where one segment is often the collapse of several JDE BUs (cost center hierarchy) and another segment is derived from a category code. The reconciliation engine has to walk the same crosswalk to compare the two balance sets — not the raw F0902 vs raw GL_BALANCES, but F0902 joined through the crosswalk to GL_BALANCES at matching grain.

    Syntra ETL's jd edwards data validation engine does this automatically. The same crosswalk used in the FBDI Journal generation is used in the validation join. Every variance surfaces with the contributing F0911 ledger rows on one side and the Fusion GL_BALANCES + GL_JE_HEADERS rows on the other. Root-cause is single-query. Resolution is single-fix. And the signed timestamped pack — F0902 vs Fusion GL, F0411 vs Fusion AP aging, F03B11 vs Fusion AR aging, F4111 vs Fusion Inventory, F1202 vs Fusion FA — is generated per load wave, not assembled manually at sign-off.

    The five reconciliation anchors

    1
    F0902 GL trial balance
    Every Company × Account × Period balance reconciled to the cent against Fusion GL_BALANCES at the post-crosswalk grain. Auditor sign-off anchor.
    2
    F0411 AP aging
    Open-item aging total + period-by-period voucher activity + F0413/F0414 payment activity reconciled to Fusion AP Payables in transaction and ledger currency.
    3
    F03B11 AR aging
    Open-item aging + invoice activity + F03B13/F03B14 receipt activity reconciled to Fusion AR Receivables in transaction and ledger currency.
    4
    F4111 item ledger + F1202 FA
    Item quantity-and-value per item × branch × period reconciled to Fusion Inventory; F1202 fixed-asset NBV reconciled to Fusion FA per asset × period.

    What jd edwards data validation tests — six core reconciliations

    Each test runs per load wave and per parallel-run month-end, producing a signed pack delta the controller can sign.

    📒

    GL trial balance (F0902)

    Company × Object × Subsidiary × Period balance in JDE joined through the crosswalk to Fusion GL Legal Entity × Account-segment × Period balance. Variance > 0.00 surfaced with root-cause.

    💰

    AP aging (F0411)

    Open-item aging total + period voucher activity + F0413/F0414 payment activity reconciled to Fusion AP at supplier × LE × period. Transaction + ledger currency parity.

    📃

    AR aging (F03B11)

    Open-item aging + invoice activity + F03B13/F03B14 receipt activity reconciled to Fusion AR at customer × LE × period. Transaction + ledger currency parity.

    📦

    Item ledger (F4111)

    Quantity-and-value per item × branch × period reconciled to Fusion Inventory at item × inventory-org × period. Cost-method-aware (frozen, current, last per F4105).

    🏢

    Fixed assets (F1202)

    Asset NBV per asset × period reconciled to Fusion FA at asset × period. Depreciation expense per period reconciled to Fusion FA period-close.

    🏭

    Manufacturing genealogy

    F4801 → F3111 → F3112 → F31122 work-order chain reconciled to Fusion Manufacturing or Parquet archive. Labor and material variance preserved.

    The jd edwards data validation execution flow — per load wave

    Same six steps every wave, fully automated. The output is the signed pack the controller and external auditor sign at parallel-run month-end.

    1

    Source-side capture — Pre-extract

    F0902 trial balance snapshot, F0411 + F0413/F0414 AP snapshot, F03B11 + F03B13/F03B14 AR snapshot, F4111 item-ledger snapshot, F1202 FA snapshot captured at period-cut with hash signatures.

    2

    Extract hash + count — During extract

    Every Parquet file staged carries a SHA-256 hash and a row count. Manifest signed and registered. Extract-vs-source-snapshot row-count parity validated before transform.

    3

    Transform crosswalk audit — During transform

    Every BU+Object+Subsidiary → 6-segment COA mapping, every F0101 → Supplier/Customer split decision, every F4101 + F4105 → Item Master + cost-layer decision captured in the crosswalk artifact.

    4

    FBDI emission hash + count — Pre-load

    Every FBDI ZIP carries a SHA-256 hash and a row count. Schema validation against current Fusion 26x release. ESS submission registered with job ID.

    5

    Post-load reconciliation — Post-load

    F0902 vs Fusion GL, F0411 vs Fusion AP, F03B11 vs Fusion AR, F4111 vs Fusion Inventory, F1202 vs Fusion FA reconciled to the cent at Company × Account × Period. Variances surfaced with contributing rows.

    6

    Signed audit pack — Per wave + per month-end

    Bundle assembled automatically: reconciliations, hashes, ESS job IDs, variance register with resolution status, crosswalk artifact, retention-overlay map. Signed, timestamped, immutable. SOX, HGB, FDA, FAA ready.

    What goes into the jd edwards data validation audit pack

    Auditor-ready evidence assembled automatically per load wave. No spreadsheets to maintain, no last-minute pack assembly at sign-off.

    📊

    F0902 trial balance reconciliation

    Company × Account × Period balance parity between JDE F0902 and Fusion GL post-crosswalk. Cent-level. Variance register with root-cause.

    💰

    Sub-ledger agings

    F0411 AP aging, F03B11 AR aging, F1202 FA NBV, F4111 item-ledger balance — each reconciled to the cent against the Fusion equivalent.

    🔐

    SHA-256 hash chain

    Every Parquet extract file and every FBDI ZIP hashed. Hashes registered in the audit pack. Tamper detection across the load chain.

    📜

    ESS job registry

    Every Fusion ESS job ID submitted, with start/end timestamp, success/failure status, row count loaded. Traceable from any record back to its load job.

    🗺️

    Crosswalk artifact

    The exact BU+Object+Subsidiary → 6-segment COA mapping, F0101 split decisions, F4101 + F4105 mappings in effect at load time. Pinned for future reference.

    🏷️

    Retention overlay map

    Which records carry which regime (SOX 7yr, HGB 10yr, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, FAA 14 CFR, DCAA/DFARS). Drives the load route (Fusion vs Parquet archive) and the audit-pack sectioning.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is jd edwards data validation in the context of a Fusion migration?+

    JD edwards data validation is the post-load reconciliation discipline that proves every JDE record arrived in Fusion intact and balanced — row count, sum total, balance parity, audit chain. The reconciliation anchor for GL is F0902 Account Balances: every Company × Account × Period balance in the JDE source must match the corresponding Fusion GL balance to the cent before sign-off. For sub-ledgers the anchors are the JDE balance reports themselves: AP open-item aging from F0411, AR aging from F03B11, fixed-asset NBV from F1202, item ledger from F4111. Without rigorous jd edwards data validation, the load completes and nobody knows whether the trial balance ties — which is when the controller refuses to sign the parallel-run pack and the cutover slips a month.

    How does Syntra ETL perform jd edwards data validation against F0911 GL trial balance?+

    The validation engine queries F0902 in JDE for the period-end balance at Company × Object × Subsidiary × Period level (matching the JDE balance grain), then queries Fusion GL for the equivalent Legal Entity × Account-segment × Period balance at the post-crosswalk grain. The two balance sets are joined through the BU+Object+Subsidiary → 6-segment COA crosswalk, summed where the JDE grain is finer than the Fusion grain (e.g. multiple JDE BUs collapsing into a single Fusion cost-center segment), and compared to the cent. Any variance > 0.00 is surfaced with the contributing F0911 row range and the corresponding Fusion GL_BALANCES row so the root-cause investigation is single-query. The output is a signed timestamped trial-balance reconciliation pack ready for controllership and audit sign-off.

    What about jd edwards data validation for F0411 AP totals?+

    AP validation runs three checks. First, the open-item aging total: sum of open F0411 vouchers (RPDOC unique with RPPYE >= 0 net of related F0413/F0414 payment offsets) compared to Fusion AP Payables Open Items at the post-crosswalk supplier and Legal Entity grain. Second, the period-by-period voucher activity: count and sum of F0411 vouchers posted in each fiscal period compared to Fusion AP Invoice creation in the equivalent period. Third, the payment activity: sum of F0413/F0414 payment header/detail compared to Fusion AP Payment activity. All three must reconcile to the cent in transaction currency and in ledger currency (where multi-currency is in scope). Variances surface with the contributing F0411 voucher RPDOC and the Fusion AP_INVOICES_ALL row so the discrepancy is investigable in one query.

    How does jd edwards data validation handle F4111 item ledger reconciliation?+

    The F4111 Item Ledger reconciliation anchors on the item-balance position at period-end: sum of F4111 transactions (ILTRQT * ILDCT-direction-sign) per Item × Branch/Plant × Period closed compared to Fusion Inventory Item Quantity at the equivalent item × inventory-org × period. For value reconciliation, sum of F4111 transactions valued at the appropriate F4105 item-cost layer (frozen, current, last per the JDE cost method) compared to Fusion Inventory Value at the equivalent item × inventory-org × period. The reconciliation engine respects JDE's item-cost-method differences across branches: an item costed frozen in Branch A and current in Branch B is reconciled per-branch using the applicable cost layer, not collapsed to a single method. Manufacturing customers also see the work-order genealogy reconciliation: a finished good in F4111 traces back through F4801 → F3111 → F3112 → F31122 and the same chain is reconciled in Fusion.

    What does the jd edwards data validation audit pack include?+

    The audit pack is a signed, timestamped, immutable bundle ready for SOX 404, German HGB, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and FAA evidence preservation. It includes: trial-balance reconciliation (F0902 vs Fusion GL) at Company × Account × Period; sub-ledger reconciliation (F0411 vs Fusion AP, F03B11 vs Fusion AR, F1202 vs Fusion FA, F4111 vs Fusion Inventory); row-count reconciliation per F-series table extracted; hash signatures (SHA-256) on every extract Parquet file and every FBDI ZIP submitted; Fusion ESS job IDs with success/failure status per load; variance register (any non-zero discrepancy with root-cause analysis and resolution status); crosswalk artifact (the exact BU+Object+Subsidiary → 6-segment COA mapping in effect at load time); and retention-overlay coverage map (which records carry which regime). The pack is generated automatically per load wave, not assembled manually at sign-off.

    How does jd edwards data validation handle multi-currency reconciliation?+

    Multi-currency JDE estates run F0911 in transaction currency (CRCD) and converted to ledger currency at posting via F0911.AA (transaction-currency amount) and F0911.ACR (ledger-currency converted amount). The reconciliation engine validates both: F0902 ledger-currency balance vs Fusion GL ledger-currency balance to the cent, and the transaction-currency activity per source-currency × period for any post-conversion drift detection. For multi-reporting-currency Fusion setups (Primary, Secondary, Reporting Currency in Fusion), the JDE F0902 balance reconciles against the matching Fusion ledger-currency representation. Currency conversion-rate alignment is a sign-off item per period: the F0015 (Currency Exchange Rate) effective rate per period is captured and validated against the Fusion Daily Rates loaded for the same period range.

    Can we use jd edwards data validation during parallel run and not just at final cutover?+

    Yes — and you should. The validation engine runs after every delta replay during parallel run, producing an incremental reconciliation pack that confirms JDE deltas captured via F0911.GLUPMJ, F0411.RPUPMJ, F03B11.RPUPMJ and F4111.ILUPMJ replayed into Fusion cleanly. Period-end month-end runs the full reconciliation (F0902 trial balance, sub-ledger agings, item-ledger balance) so the controller and auditor see a clean F0902-anchored sign-off pack at the end of each parallel-run month before the next month begins. By the time final cutover arrives, the reconciliation evidence is two or three months deep, the variance register has been worked to zero, and the cutover decision is procedural — not a leap of faith.

    What happens when jd edwards data validation finds variances?+

    Variances are first-class output — captured, classified and routed to a re-runnable bulk-fix queue, not buried in an Excel tracker. Each variance carries: the reconciliation anchor that surfaced it (F0902 balance, F0411 voucher aging, F4111 item balance), the JDE source rows contributing, the Fusion target rows present (or absent), a classification (crosswalk gap, OMW custom logic missed, period-cut timing, currency-rate drift, retention-policy routing error), and a recommended action (re-extract, re-transform, re-load, sign-off as approved variance). The bulk-fix queue lets you re-run a specific slice (one Company × one Period × one Account range) without rebuilding the full extract — critical when the variance is found at month-end and you have hours, not days, to resolve.

    See jd edwards data validation run against your F0902

    Book a working session. We'll take a snapshot of one Company × one period from your F0902, walk it through the crosswalk to a sample Fusion GL_BALANCES, and show you the cent-level reconciliation pack — with variance register, hash chain, and ESS job registry — exactly as the auditor will see it.