Replace Birst, M3 BI and Smart Office with Fusion-native OTBI, BI Publisher, Smart View and OAS. Unified historical+current reporting via cross-source views to the Syntra cloud archive. SAF-T / HGB / FEC statutory reporting. MEC document re-platforming. Day-one go-live.
Finance, supply chain, manufacturing and quality teams cannot operate Fusion on day one without the dashboards they depended on in M3. Building reporting after the cutover lands business operations in the dark. Building it before cutover makes go-live trustworthy.
Consultant-led M3 to Fusion migrations typically defer reporting to a phase 2 workstream. The data migration goes live, finance and operations users land on Fusion without their familiar dashboards, productivity drops by 30–50%, complaints escalate, and the analytics rebuild becomes a fire-fight scrambling to catch up while the business is bleeding. By the time phase 2 lands, trust in the migration has eroded.
Syntra ETL's infor m3 reporting after migration framework builds reporting during the migration build phase, not after. Birst inventoried in week one of the assessment. Replacement plan (OTBI / BI Publisher / Smart View / OAS) signed in week three. Rebuild executed in parallel with the data migration build. Validated against Birst equivalents during parallel run. Deployed ahead of cutover. Day one of Fusion go-live, finance and operations users land with dashboards they recognise — producing identical answers to the M3 dashboards they were using on Friday.
Same framework handles unified historical + current reporting — finance investigation that spans the retention window (in the Syntra cloud archive) and the current operational window (in Fusion) returns unified results from a single query. Statutory reporting per jurisdiction (SAF-T, HGB, FEC, JPK, Hungarian Online Invoice, Spanish SII) goes live with cutover. MEC document reports re-platformed to Fusion BI Publisher and OIC adapters so partner-facing documents are operational from day one.
Each domain has its own sign-off authority and its own go-live gate — analytics goes live with the data, not later.
Working capital, cash position, AP aging, AR aging, GL variance vs budget, period-close progress, inter-company reconciliation — rebuilt as OTBI dashboards. Finance lead signs per CONO.
MO throughput, WIP age, yield variance, scrap rate, on-time-completion, capacity utilisation per workcentre — rebuilt as OTBI dashboards. Manufacturing lead signs per CONO.
Inventory turn, days-of-supply, supplier OTIF, demand-vs-supply variance, distribution OTIF, freight cost vs budget — rebuilt as OTBI. Supply chain lead signs per CONO.
SAF-T (PT/NO/LU), FEC, JPK, Hungarian Online Invoice, Spanish SII, HGB-aligned, US tax, UK MTD — configured via Fusion localisations + BIP templates. Tax signs per CONO.
Customer invoice PDFs, supplier remittance, ASN, dispatch notes, packing slips, partner EDI templates — rebuilt as BIP or OIC adapters. Trading-partner-specific formats preserved.
OTBI cross-source views and OAS direct connections span Syntra cloud archive + live Fusion. Finance investigation across retention window returns unified results from a single query.
Reporting build runs in parallel with the data migration build so analytics goes live with cutover, not after.
Every active Birst dashboard, M3 BI report, Smart Office view inventoried with usage telemetry. Classified into retire / OTBI / BIP / Smart View / OAS buckets. Signed per CONO.
Per CONO statutory reporting obligations mapped to Fusion localisation modules + BIP templates. MEC document inventory captured with partner-specific format requirements documented.
Operational dashboards rebuilt as OTBI dashboards per signed plan. Finance / manufacturing / supply chain dashboards prioritised. Validated against Birst equivalents during parallel run.
Statutory reports and MEC document templates rebuilt as BI Publisher templates per signed plan. Partner-specific formats preserved. Direct filing endpoints integrated via OIC.
OTBI cross-source views configured spanning Fusion + Syntra cloud archive. OAS direct connections established. Complex models (demand forecasting, supplier risk) built in OAS.
Reporting deployed to Fusion ahead of data cutover. Finance, manufacturing, supply chain, quality leads validate against Birst equivalents during parallel run. Sign-off complete before data cut.
Per CONO, per domain. Sign-off ready before the data cutover weekend.
Per CONO per domain, the OTBI dashboards rebuilt and validated against Birst equivalents. Finance, manufacturing, supply chain, quality, compliance leads signed.
Per CONO per statutory obligation, BIP templates configured and validated. Partner-specific MEC document templates re-platformed. Trading-partner sign-off where applicable.
Per CONO per jurisdiction, the SAF-T / HGB / FEC / JPK / Hungarian Online Invoice / Spanish SII extract pre-flight verified against M3 equivalent. Tax signs per CONO.
OTBI cross-source views span Fusion + Syntra cloud archive. Validated against unified-period sample queries. Finance investigation produces identical results across both sources.
Demand forecasting, supplier risk scoring, predictive maintenance models built in OAS. Validated against historical baseline. Phase-2 enhancement plan documented.
Per role per CONO, user training delivered before cutover. Quick-reference cards. Power-user community established. Hypercare reporting-specific support staffed.
Infor m3 reporting after migration covers the full analytics and reporting stack that finance, operations, supply chain, manufacturing, quality and compliance need on day-one of Fusion go-live and onward. It replaces M3 Birst, M3 BI content, Smart Office views, MEC document reports and Modification Suite-extended reports with Fusion-native equivalents (OTBI, BI Publisher, Smart View, OAS) plus optional warehouse-side analytics (Snowflake / BigQuery / Databricks) for unified historical-plus-current reporting that spans the Syntra cloud archive and the live Fusion environment. The infor m3 reporting after migration strategy is built during the migration build phase so go-live includes the analytics layer, not just the transactions.
Birst is Infor's own analytics platform with its own semantic model, its own dashboard catalog, its own user-licensing and its own roadmap. Fusion uses OTBI (Oracle Transactional BI) for self-service analytics and BI Publisher for pixel-perfect operational reports, with OAS (Oracle Analytics Cloud) for genuinely complex models and Smart View for Excel-tethered finance analysis. The semantic models don't translate — Birst's metric definitions are tied to M3's data structure and need to be re-architected against Fusion's data structure. The infor m3 reporting after migration framework inventories every active Birst dashboard, classifies by business value, retires the 40–60% that are duplicated or unused, and rebuilds the remainder against Fusion-native tooling.
Typical multi-CONO M3 tenant has 80–200 active Birst dashboards in production use. The infor m3 reporting after migration assessment inventories every dashboard with usage telemetry (who opens it, in which role, in which CONO, how often) and classifies into four buckets. Retire (40–60%): duplicated, unused, low-business-value dashboards killed during cleanup. Rebuild as OTBI (20–30%): self-service analytics for finance ops, supply chain ops, sales operations — natural OTBI fit. Rebuild as BI Publisher (15–25%): pixel-perfect operational reports for statutory filing, supplier remittance, customer invoice prints. Rebuild as Smart View (5–10%): Excel-tethered finance analysis. Rebuild as OAS (5–10%): complex models like demand forecasting, supplier risk scoring, predictive maintenance.
Most finance and operations users need reports that span the historical retention window (in the Syntra cloud archive) and the current operational window (in Fusion). The infor m3 reporting after migration framework enables this through cross-source OTBI views (OTBI queries that federate across Fusion subject areas and the archive's SQL-accessible Parquet partitions) and OAS direct connections (OAS connects to both Fusion and the archive, producing unified visualisations). For specialised warehouse-side analytics (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) the archive feeds the same warehouse as the Fusion data, with downstream BI tools (Tableau, Power BI, Looker) querying unified models. Historical context is preserved without expensive Fusion storage.
Statutory reporting per jurisdiction is a non-negotiable post-migration capability. The infor m3 reporting after migration framework configures Fusion-native statutory reporting (Fusion's localisation modules for the major jurisdictions) and BI Publisher templates for jurisdiction-specific formats — Portuguese SAF-T, Norwegian SAF-T, Luxembourg SAF-T, French FEC, Polish JPK, Hungarian Online Invoice, Spanish SII, German HGB-aligned reports, UK MTD, etc. Each statutory extract is verified during the cutover pre-flight against the equivalent M3 extract for that period — output must match. Direct filing endpoints (Hungarian Online Invoice real-time, Spanish SII real-time) integrated via OIC where supported.
Finance teams typically depend on a small number of high-traffic operational dashboards — working capital, cash position, AP aging, AR aging, GL variance vs budget, inter-company reconciliation status, period-close progress. The infor m3 reporting after migration framework prioritises these in the rebuild plan: they go live with cutover, not after. OTBI dashboards built and validated against Birst equivalents during the migration build phase, deployed to Fusion ahead of the cutover, sign-off by the finance team confirming the new dashboards produce identical answers. No finance team is asked to wait three months post-cutover for their core operational analytics.
Manufacturing dashboards (MO throughput, WIP age, yield variance, scrap rate, on-time-completion, capacity utilisation per workcentre) and supply chain dashboards (inventory turn, days-of-supply, supplier OTIF, demand-vs-supply variance, distribution OTIF) follow the same infor m3 reporting after migration rebuild pattern. The Birst-equivalent operational dashboards manufacturing and supply chain leads depend on go live with cutover. Where Fusion's embedded AI features add value (demand sensing, supply network resiliency, supplier risk scoring), OAS-based analytics extend the rebuild beyond like-for-like to leverage Fusion's native AI — typically as a phase-2 enhancement post-cutover stability.
MEC handles a large volume of partner-facing document reports — customer invoice PDFs, supplier remittance advice, ASN documents, dispatch notes, packing slips, partner-formatted EDI 810/856/855 transmissions. The infor m3 reporting after migration framework re-platforms each of these to either Fusion BI Publisher (for the pixel-perfect PDF documents) or OIC EDI adapters (for the partner-formatted EDI transmissions). Trading-partner-specific document formats preserved — partner A still receives their preferred invoice template, partner B still receives their preferred ASN format. The re-platforming runs in parallel with the data migration so partner-facing documents are operational from day one of Fusion go-live.
30-minute walkthrough. We'll review your Birst dashboard inventory, statutory reporting footprint and MEC document scope — and propose a reporting rebuild plan that lands ahead of cutover so go-live is trustworthy from day one.